When choosing an electric motor there are several things to consider to make sure you get the perfect drive solution for your product.
With the guide below covering aspects of motor design such as torque, duty cycle, thermal limits and efficiency, we hope to provide a reference point when selecting your motor.
Power requirement is one of the most important factors when specifying a motor gearbox and is the mechanical power required by the application, measured in watts or horsepower. Power is determined by the speed and torque needed for the application and is not always straightforward for the customer to determine in complex applications. Measuring or calculating the requirements of the application is the critical first step in motor and gearbox selection and optimization of the customer product.
|Power (Watts) = Torque x RPM x 0.10472||1 Electrical Horsepower (HpE) = 746.000w|
|Torque = Power (Watts) / (RPM x 0.10472)||1 Metric Horsepower (HpM) = 735.499w|
|RPM = Power (Watts) / (Torque x 0.10472)||1 Mechanical Horsepower (Hpl) = 745.670w|
|Celsius to Fahrenheit F = 9/5C + 32||Fahrenheit to Celsius C = 5/9(F – 32)|
Torque is the force multiplied by distance, with common units being Nm, lb-ft and oz-in (conversion table displayed).
With the required torque defined, understanding the speed requirement is also critical. The speed is defined as rad/s – the equations shown below take care of this and use the more common RPM.
The mechanical power calculated provides a good indication of the motor gearbox size needed but it is only an indication because the same motor output watts can be achieved in ‘low speed with high torque’ or ‘high speed with low torque’ configurations.
Torque Speed Graphs
Torque Speed Graphs display information from the motor gearbox supplier of the performance of the product and are an important tool when choosing an electric motor. They display the subtleties of the motor or motor and gearbox performance with the torque output displayed at all speeds, probably down close to stall.
With these simple motor gearbox Torque Speed Graphs, and the torque and speed determined for the application, it is possible to see if the selected motor gearbox can drive the application at all speeds required and how much torque is still available to the application if needed.
With this graph it is also possible to determine the current (amps) requirement for the application, aiding the selection of drive control and motor protection (as shown). Parvalux generally publishes motor gearbox data in table form due to the sheer number of combinations and variants possible, but torque speed curves are produced in-house on a selection of dynamometers.
Example: The graph shown is for a PM63 DC motor with a GB9 worm wheel gearbox. It can be determined that if the application requires 30Nm, the output speed from the gearbox would be 37RPM and require 11Amps. Should the load increase to 50Nm, the speed would decrease to 33RPM and require 17Amps.
Gearbox Thermal Limits
|Gearbox Type||Thermal Rating (Watts)|
|L, LH LB, LF, LHB, LS, LSH||60||72|
Gearbox thermal limits are a limiting factor when using motor gearboxes in excess of the normal continuous S1 duty cycle.
This continuous duty cycle is most likely the duty cycle displayed in the Torque Speed graph, but Parvalux has many years’ experience in optimisation of the application and has comprehensive data on our gearboxes for intermittent use.
Approximate Parvalux gearbox rating limits can be calculated for both continuous and intermittent duty cycle by using information below:
Continuous Duty Cycle (S1)
The thermal rating of the gearbox can be calculated using the following formula:
Approx. Thermal Rating (W) = ((Final RPM x Torque (Nm)) / 9.55) x (1/n) – 1
n = efficiency of the gearbox (available on request)
Intermittent Duty Cycle
For intermittent duty the thermal rating of the gearbox (see table) is increased by
multiplying the appropriate gearbox thermal rating by the factor x:
x = √(100% / Duty Cycle %)
|S1||Continuous Duty Cycle||The motor works at a constant load for a long enough time to reach temperature equilibrium|
|S2||Short Time Duty Cycle||The motor works at a constant load but not long enough to reach temperature equilibrium. Rest periods allow the motor to reach ambient temperature|
|S3||Intermittent Periodic Cycle||Sequential, identical run and rest cycles with constant load. Temperature equilibrium is never reached. Starting current has little effect on temperature rise|
|S4||Intermittent Periodic Duty with Starting||Sequential, identical start, run, and rest cycles with constant load. Temperature equilibrium is not reached, but starting current affects temperature rise|
|S5||Intermittent Periodic Duty with Electric Braking||Sequential, identical cycles of starting and running at a constant load and running with no load. No rest periods|
|S6||Continuous Operation with Intermittent Load||Sequential, identical cycles of starting and running at a constant load and running with no load. No rest periods|
|S7||Continuous Operation with Electric Braking||Sequential, identical cycles of starting and running at a constant load and electric braking. No rest periods|
|S8||Continuous Operation with Periodic Load & Speed Changes||Sequential, identical cycles run at constant load and given speed, then run at other constant loads and speeds. No rest periods|
When choosing an electric motor, efficiency is an essential factor. Efficiency of both the motor and the gearbox and the combined efficiency is a topic in its own right but essentially normally more than the performance variables need to be included in the selection process.
Parvalux has great experience in comparing the different motor and gearbox technologies and assessing the trade-off between them in a given application. Parvalux’s experience in supplying many industries is unprecedented and quickly allows discussions on the correct technology for the application. For OEMs requiring large volumes, ‘technology rigs’ can be constructed using different technologies to empirically compare data in the application, but many non-performance variables inevitably need to be added to the selection process when seeking ultimate efficiencies (costs, marketing benefits, system complexity etc).
A very simplified example of the ‘trade-offs’ when considering efficiency is displayed in a battery operated winch example in the table shown.
Technology TypePMDC Motor & Worm Wheel GearboxProsConsSimple componentsLower efficiencyMany ratios won’t back-driveSimple controllerSimple maintenanceLow costTechnology TypeBrushless Motor & Epicyclic GearboxProsConsHigher efficiencyComplex componentsExtended battery lifeElectronic controllerQuietMay back-driveMay need brakeGreater cost
This example is certainly subjective, written in context to a battery-operated winch and not exhaustive, but demonstrates other factors when considering efficiency. There are also only two technology combinations considered although many other motor/gearbox technology combinations could be compared. When comparing technology groups for ultimate efficiency you may wish to select a brushless motor with epicyclic gearbox, which, in general, would give you the best efficiency but at additional cost and complexity. For example, a winch may need to self-sustain (not move when the power is off but the load is still applied) which a worm-wheel gearbox can achieve due to its inefficiencies.
The epicyclic gearbox may well not self-sustain due to its increased efficiency, therefore requiring extra items such as a mechanical brake and all the control complexities that go with it. The cost of the additional brake, its control, along with the PWM controller for the brushless motor, can be considerable when compared to the simplicity of a permanent DC motor & worm wheel gearbox. Parvalux’s experience with the many technologies we can offer will save you time when choosing an electric motor and gearbox technology for your application.
If you require additional guidance, please contact our friendly sales team, below and we’ll be happy to help.
I am thankful for all of those who said NO to me. Its because of them I’m doing it myself.
Imperfection is beauty, madness is genius and it’s better to be absolutely ridiculous than absolutely boring.